"Haves vs. Have-Nots

"Haves vs Have-Nots":   Haves they are noble  in name not in deed;/ have-nots are noble in deed and indeed./ If not for the have-nots the haves would not be./ if not for the have-nots the haves they would need.               At false appreciation the haves are adroit./ They have an innate talent of how to exploit./ When it comes to indifference the haves do not care./ Taxes are burdens that have-nots must bear!        For have-nots some haves must hold quite a grudge./ When hard work arrives have-nots must drudge./ While haves, who are bosses, sit there and won't budge.

Haves are oft most apt to succeed./ They don't seem to care what have-nots may need.

Haves they are Evil./ Haves they are mean./ Haves have the power for haves have the greed./ If have-nots all voted haves would not lead./ If have-nots revolt(ed) haves oft must flee./ When have-nots get angry haves often bleed./ For have-nots concerns haves they should heed./ Or when have-nots get fed-up they may use (a) guill-o-tine.